User:WilburnYork

Purely out of curiosity - why this camera setting? So I came across something in the durchschmöckern on an image - > * links are visible only for registered and logged users. *** I actually already frequently noticed, for objects, etc which are just in hibernation to choose a fast shutter speed and the ISO Jay: in this case, 1/640 and ISO 200 Why ISO 200? The lion Yes not sprints through the area but lying comfortably, so why to extend the closure time and again to go on ISO 100? The guy who took the picture has great images in the portfolio, so I guess he knows what he's doing! Only understand tu me honestly say not Hold me now for stupid, but please make a simple logical statement Thank you (my only explanation that photography ideas logiosch to me is as follows: the author has covered sky set the aperture on the camera and ISO 200 is because dark light, and then forget to the switch than the Sun to the surface came) Firstly it is perfect no matter what turns the noise or ISO100 or 200 (400), secondly the half shutter speed would be enough - the classic free hand limit does not apply when these pixel monsters. Do you mean that at 200 mm 1/320 too little is at 36mpix? Certainly it is itose, you will see no Uterscheid between ISO 100 and ISO 200, was only a fundamental question This is a property of Nikon: Quote: According to nikon to use iso 200 as output sensitivity because the corresponding sensors here cover the best contrast range. lower values that are specified here with "lo", are only intended for recorded very intense light conditions to enable but bring no benefits in terms of image quality. AHA, so is what Canon called the "Tone value priority"? The D800 is ISO 100 but not "lo", but only from ISO 50 at 1/640 exposure time? Or have I misunderstood you? The question is: we don't know what the photographer has photographed immediately before that, where he needed a higher ISO maybe. I also rather tend to set the ISO "plenty" as too close to leeway in time and have Aperture and image noise is not as a topic FX (maybe due also of the analog past, where it was so less flexible and was actually for amateurs at 800). I'm not on but also, to admit that it sometimes happened to me, that very high ISO are set by the last shot and I simply forget to adjust, especially, if it must go fast